{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"El Diario de Tucuman","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web","title":"Que los jueces no inventen c\u00e1lculos de reajuste - El Diario de Tucuman","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lCyJsNMrhe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/que-los-jueces-no-inventen-calculos-de-reajuste\/\">Que los jueces no inventen c\u00e1lculos de reajuste<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/que-los-jueces-no-inventen-calculos-de-reajuste\/embed\/#?secret=lCyJsNMrhe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abQue los jueces no inventen c\u00e1lculos de reajuste\u00bb \u2014 El Diario de Tucuman\" data-secret=\"lCyJsNMrhe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/4a76de52080d2dee0a6389aaea0fbb49.jpeg","thumbnail_width":960,"thumbnail_height":720,"description":"La Corte Suprema de Justicia dej\u00f3 sin efecto un fallo judicial que fij\u00f3 una pauta para reajustar la jubilaci\u00f3n de un empleado jer\u00e1rquico sobre un guarismo no previsto en la Ley 24.241 de jubilaciones. As\u00ed lo entendieron los supremos Ricardo Lorenzetti, Elena Highton de Nolasco, Juan Carlos Maqueda, Horacio Rosatti y Carlos Rosenkrantz. Seg\u00fan informa [&hellip;]"}