{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"El Diario de Tucuman","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web","title":"Cara a cara con el juez - El Diario de Tucuman","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rWujM55eUC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/cara-a-cara-con-el-juez\/\">Cara a cara con el juez<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/cara-a-cara-con-el-juez\/embed\/#?secret=rWujM55eUC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abCara a cara con el juez\u00bb \u2014 El Diario de Tucuman\" data-secret=\"rWujM55eUC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.eldiariodetucuman.com\/web\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/d015471a4d4c2b9a074f015728d569cc.jpeg","thumbnail_width":960,"thumbnail_height":720,"description":"En los autos\u00a0\u00abS. B. A. s\/ determinaci\u00f3n de la capacidad\u00bb, la\u00a0C\u00e1mara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil determin\u00f3 que para garantizar el debido proceso es\u00a0es necesaria una\u00a0entrevista personal del magistrado con el sujeto cuya capacidad jur\u00eddica se procura\u00a0restringir. Seg\u00fan informa el Diario Judicial, los miembros del Tribunal sostuvieron que, de ahora en m\u00e1s, se\u00a0deber\u00e1 mantener [&hellip;]"}